Fartcoin
Go beyond the rating.
A deeper investigation into the asset, its market structure, risks, on-chain evidence, project claims and supporting sources — combining AUCTOR data, AI-assisted evidence gathering and human review.
Prepared and reviewed manually by AUCTOR Research before delivery. No account required.
Independent analytical opinion. Not financial advice.
Executive Summary
Fartcoin is a Solana-based general token assessed under AUCTOR's General Token profile. The asset has been live for approximately 676 days and has market data coverage from connected sources, including a reported market capitalization of about $181.12 million, liquidity of about $8.07 million, and 24-hour volume of about $2.59 million.
The strongest evidence relates to on-chain activity, liquidity, security configuration, tokenomics, and transparency. Reported signals include 4,857 transactions over 24 hours, 164,024 holders, open-source status, disabled minting and freezing, renounced ownership, and a reported 100% LP locked percentage.
The main risks are data-quality and structural monitoring points rather than a single failing category. RugCheck repeatedly flags "LP Vault unlocked" despite the reported LP locked percentage, top-10 holders control 35.25% of supply, community evidence is only partial, and development and sustainability data are insufficient from connected sources.
AUCTOR assigns a final rating of AAA at 90.8/100, with 78/100 confidence and 93% category coverage. This indicates a strong evidence-based trust profile, while leaving room for caution because several important qualitative areas are incomplete or conflicting.
Official AUCTOR Rating
Category Ratings
Weighted · General TokenRed Flags · 3
AI Investment Thesis
AUCTOR is an independent assessment engine — it never tells you to buy, sell or hold. The thesis below gives you the context and interpretation to decide for yourself.
The rating profile is unusually strong across measurable infrastructure categories: On-Chain Activity, Security, Tokenomics, Transparency, and Liquidity all score in the AAA range. These scores are supported by high reported holder count, active transaction flow, non-mintable and non-freezable configuration, renounced ownership, and meaningful liquidity relative to the available market data.
The overall AAA grade reflects broad category coverage and strong machine-verifiable signals under the General Token weighting profile. However, the confidence score of 78/100 is lower than the headline grade because not all relevant dimensions are fully evidenced: Community is only partial, Development and Sustainability are insufficient, and RugCheck reports repeated LP Vault unlocked risks.
In aggregate, the asset presents a strong quantitative trust profile with notable monitoring requirements. The key interpretive issue is not current market price, but whether the positive security and liquidity signals remain consistent with third-party risk flags and whether missing qualitative disclosures improve over time.
The asset could represent an opportunity from a trust-infrastructure perspective because it combines broad reported holder distribution, high recent transaction count, meaningful liquidity, open-source status, disabled minting and freezing, and renounced ownership. The close alignment between market capitalization and FDV also suggests limited dilution in the data provided.
The case is weakened by incomplete qualitative evidence and unresolved risk flags. Community coverage is only partial, Development and Sustainability are insufficient, RugCheck repeatedly reports LP Vault unlocked, and the top-10 holder concentration of 35.25% remains a structural concentration point.
- AAA final rating of 90.8/100
- 164,024 holders and 4,857 daily transactions reported
- Open source, non-mintable, non-freezable, owner renounced
- RugCheck repeatedly flags LP Vault unlocked
- Top-10 holders control 35.25%
- Development and sustainability data are insufficient
- ↑ Resolution or clarification of RugCheck LP Vault unlocked flags
- ↑ Verified development activity from connected sources
- ↑ Improved community data coverage and engagement evidence
- ↓ Confirmation that LP vault exposure is material
- ↓ Deterioration in liquidity or transaction activity
- ↓ Increase in holder concentration or new security risks
Supporting Evidence
Market Data
Security Findings
The security source did not return data for this asset, so security metrics could not be verified. This lowers the confidence score and does not affect the rating positively or negatively.
Data Sources & Evidence
- • Honeypot detection (not supported on Solana)
- • Buy/Sell tax (not applicable on Solana)
Methodology
The Official AUCTOR Rating is the weighted average of every rated category, re-normalised over the categories for which sufficient independent data was available. Categories marked Insufficient Data are excluded from the score and reduce the report's Coverage and Confidence. Weights are adaptive and depend on the asset type (General Token) — No specialised signals detected — evaluated with the general-token profile.
AUCTOR ratings are independent, evidence-based analytical opinions on structural quality, transparency and risk — not investment advice, not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold, and not a price prediction. Data is cross-referenced from independent public sources and reflects the moment of analysis. Always do your own research.